That Lucifer is bad no one in doubt, although the causes and effects of this evil queen complete silence. What does Lucifer to be bad is a response that takes place in a negative sense. Incites us to sin, thus condemning the eternal banishment from God's arms. The propaganda machine of the supreme being has ever discrediting the fallen angel and we suspect that this sentence was never executed as the right to a fair trial. We would like to exploit enigmatic points of this myth in order to clarify an ethical model. Accurate
would remember that Lucifer was an archangel, specifically the beauty and it has long been linked with truth and goodness. Now add that "Lucifer" in Latin means "the bringer of light" and that in certain passages of the Bible this is a description used to refer to Jesus. No cost to see that the light is often a metaphor for the truth. We now have some materials for believing that whatever the motive that led to Lucifer to be contrary to God, perhaps had a better foundation than the superb as usual is blamed. Perhaps Lucifer did not want to supplant God perhaps only took the opposite or remarked to him that he was wrong.
recap now and think about the concept of God. What is God? God is the verb, the word creates reality and prescribes the order. Then perhaps the sin of Lucifer was not disobedience but take the opposite, perhaps what he did was ask why Lucifer, calling into question the absolute validity of the divine command, suggesting that another order is possible. This was their sin that sent him to exile in hell. There, alone, helpless and powerless to defend themselves could not divine the relentless propaganda that accused him of sleeping with women and children others, steal and murder (not necessariamente in this order) and many unhealthy acts born of the repressed psyche of the acolytes of God.
as said, the Luciferian not lie in aberrant acts but in the uncomfortable habit of criticism: to find the assumptions that underlie the ideas and show what forces obey. In this sense we think the Luciferian as a consistent philosophical genuinely come to seek the knowledge of the deep.
Whether in the fight against Platonic doxa, ie the "view" typical of a knowledge based on the sensitivity that is blind to the essential, whether Kantian transcendental space browsing under the conditions of possibility of cognitive acts or the genealogies of the power of Nietzsche is a philosophical habit of analyzing specifically ahundar and deny what is common and accepted dogmatically.
We can now see the trite phrase "take it fiosofía" to be obeyed, would lead to a world of shadows and rivalries, because we would constantly criticizing others and would live mired in systematic misunderstanding.
should be noted that to say that to an intractable problem it is best to assume an attitude of heroic resignation would not be appropriate to say "take it philosophy" but "stoically" that is, a school of thought that argues that "liberty lies in the acceptance of fate."
would be good practice to say "stoically" when we appeal for calm, because the philosophy is to give voice to the thought of all that silence when truth prevails. And this is a road that leads, as you know Lucifer, the glacial solitude of hell.
