If one looks for the word leisure in the dictionary, you find that has a double significance. The negative means time outside the work schedule, or positive, with respect activities outside work undertaken in this period. Many different activities can be considered as leisure: being caught between the cushions of the sofa and the cathode ray television, in nightclubs moral inhibitions, cloistered to sweat together through streamlined arrangements, insult to yell at a man dressed in black while it looks like 22 people playing soccer, etc..
is often called to such leisure activities as ritual downloads. Why are rituals require two conditions: repetition and alignment with procedural rules. At the same time, it is said that download why these rituals help to withstand the fatigue and boredom of work.
presumably far there is no problem in accepting it, but would make an observation. What bothers us the job? Does the repetition of actions? Did routine? Does the lack of surprise? This will tend to say in an almost mechanical, giving the impression that the adventure is the opposite of work. But against the disgusting work we deal with rituals download face does not mean your work with more work? We accept that the adventure is not the opposite of routine, but then that is special about the leisure activity that we prefer to work? Or not, what is it we hate to work, if we recognize that it is not routine?
may say that the rituals of discharge, in front of the paper provide the agent pleasure. Could also be said that through this pleasure, the agent forgets the pain and anguish the workplace regime generates. Displays a diabolical dialectic here. As if the pleasure of leisure serves as compensation to work, goes on to be one of the reasons that compel us to work. We need to make money to be able to guarantee these small rituals of discharge. What was once half now becomes end. Rituals are therefore also download inicicación rituals or subject. Let
scoring a second difference of leisure respect for the work.
We accept that the routine is not the cause of discomfort at work, since the discharge rituals are also based on them and yet give pleasure. Then we tested a second explanation to the question about what distinguishes leisure from work. It could be that what is really unpleasant to work is the fact that the outcome of the action does not directly affect the life of the performer, but as mediators or alienated, in the form of wages. This is a Marxist-type response boatiné gown that alienation as a criterion would spread between work and leisure. A current criticism would think the leisure and work is already the fruit of the victory of capitalism, since the logic economic productivity penetrates every corner of daily life. In our spare time, we fed the hungry market. A consumer facing entertainment is just the final victory of capitalism. Viewed
so revolutionary is to make the most vague. But if laziness really wants to be anti-system should not be limited to leisure time, but fully penetrate all areas of life. Thus, we can see the clerk Bartleby Mellville as a revolutionary pioneer. Someone who refuses to let his life be subordinated to the logic of profit and this so radical, that can only be a genuine act of subversion, it is absolutely useless.
The tragedy of post-capitalist revolution is that the measure is effective in ensuring their own safety.
